US v. Kilkenny, No. 05-6847
Sentence based on guilty plea to bank fraud, mail fraud, and structuring a financial transaction to evade currency reporting requirement requires remand where the district court's use of the 2002 version of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines violated the Ex Post Facto Clause of Article I of the Constitution
Showing posts with label white collar. Show all posts
Showing posts with label white collar. Show all posts
Friday, July 06, 2007
Thursday, June 28, 2007
US v. Spear, No. 06-1296
In a criminal matter involving a defendant who worked as a federal immigration employee responsible for the intake of certain immigration applications, and who kept the accompanying fees but threw the applications in the trash, a sentence for embezzlement of government funds in excess of $1,000 is reversed and remanded where defendant's position lacked the authority and discretion required for the abuse of public trust sentence enhancement
In a criminal matter involving a defendant who worked as a federal immigration employee responsible for the intake of certain immigration applications, and who kept the accompanying fees but threw the applications in the trash, a sentence for embezzlement of government funds in excess of $1,000 is reversed and remanded where defendant's position lacked the authority and discretion required for the abuse of public trust sentence enhancement
Thursday, June 21, 2007
preliminary injunction, prohibiting the government from seizing "the contents of any personal e-mail account maintained by an Internet Service Provide
Warshak v. US, No. 06-4092
A preliminary injunction, prohibiting the government from seizing "the contents of any personal e-mail account maintained by an Internet Service Provider in the name of any resident of the Southern District of Ohio without providing the relevant account holder or subscriber prior notice and an opportunity to be heard on any complaint, motion, or other pleading seeking issuance of such an order" is affirmed, with slight modification, where the district court correctly determined that e-mail users maintain a reasonable expectation of privacy in the content of their e-mails, and the injunctive relief it crafted was largely appropriate.
A preliminary injunction, prohibiting the government from seizing "the contents of any personal e-mail account maintained by an Internet Service Provider in the name of any resident of the Southern District of Ohio without providing the relevant account holder or subscriber prior notice and an opportunity to be heard on any complaint, motion, or other pleading seeking issuance of such an order" is affirmed, with slight modification, where the district court correctly determined that e-mail users maintain a reasonable expectation of privacy in the content of their e-mails, and the injunctive relief it crafted was largely appropriate.
Monday, June 04, 2007
indictment did not allege a scheme to defraud anyone of money or property
US v. Ratcliff, No. 05-30666
In a prosecution for mail fraud based on alleged activities involving election fraud in Louisiana, dismissal of mail fraud counts based on a conclusion that the indictment did not allege a scheme to defraud anyone of money or property, thereby failing to state the offense of mail fraud under 18 U.S.C. section 1341, is affirmed over the government's claim that a scheme to obtain the salary and employment benefits of elected office through election fraud satisfies the requirements of the mail fraud statute.
In a prosecution for mail fraud based on alleged activities involving election fraud in Louisiana, dismissal of mail fraud counts based on a conclusion that the indictment did not allege a scheme to defraud anyone of money or property, thereby failing to state the offense of mail fraud under 18 U.S.C. section 1341, is affirmed over the government's claim that a scheme to obtain the salary and employment benefits of elected office through election fraud satisfies the requirements of the mail fraud statute.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)